Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login

More from DeviantArt


Submitted on
August 10, 2012
Image Size
544 KB


2,356 (1 today)
37 (who?)
FeministFrequency In A Nutshell by NOKAPIplz FeministFrequency In A Nutshell by NOKAPIplz
This is the funniest TLDR I wrote. It's all based on how Anita Sarkeesian's videos are. I know she looks a bit like Meg Griffin here, but eh, I tried.

:bulletgreen:She doesn't talk about sexism against men at all, even though she claims feminism is for equal rights.

:bulletgreen:She has never made a video about misogyny in the middle east.

:bulletgreen:She hates art that includes sexy dead women and says it has no place in art and that it's disempowering.

:bulletgreen:She exploded trying to sum up Zack Snyder's "Sucker Punch". Basically getting mad that some men have a libido and a fetish for that stuff.

:bulletgreen:She hides comments that are sexist or anything that criticizes her points of view and questioning her source material.

:bulletgreen:She never acknowledges the constructive criticism and only posted the troll comments she got on one blog entry. This is an attempt to make her look like the victim.

:bulletgreen:She conned people into giving her money.

:bulletgreen:All she really wants to do is make the world realize the first world problems of females in the North American continent.

:bulletred:Don't joke about periods in front of her, because doing so is the equivalent of joking about people dying from diseases.

:bulletred:Don't argue with her, she'll pull an excuse out of one of her three glory holes.

:bulletred:If you do argue with her, prepare for lulz.

PS: She has some of the most idiotic fans I've seen in a while. Barely any of them actually do their own research and goes with what she says unless they happen to be more familiar with the subject matter than she is. They also can't tell the difference between trolls and cyberbullies.
Add a Comment:
TheTyperVG Featured By Owner 2 days ago  New member
Helixdude Featured By Owner Nov 17, 2014
Why am i not surprised that she looks like Meg Griffin..
Blackestfang Featured By Owner Oct 27, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Not to mention she takes everything out of context for her 'examples'. a couple examples.

- hitman: she complains about killing strippers and using them as a distraction when you are actually not suppose to kill them and just sneak around them since they are not part of the mission an innocent people.

- darkness: the line "i take from you" isn't taking the main character's 'power' it's killing someone he deeply cared for.

- time splitters: future perfect: a female is tied to the tracks but in the full scene the train stops far away from her, she gets out and they make several jokes because it's a parody.

- deadlight: she shows a character having her clothes ripped off yelling for help. even though in context the people doing that are washing her down because of an infection and they don't want to get bite, many other people had the same thing happen including other women, children, and men.
Kuzupekoyama Featured By Owner Aug 8, 2014
EclipticSpectre Featured By Owner Jun 15, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Oh fuck that cretinous cu- on second thought, don't. While her bigoted and misandrist demeanour alone isn't all that much to fuss over since I feel the absence of support from anyone who thrives on spouting the superficial nonsense that she does is a worthy loss, it angers me that she actually makes a career, a living wage, out of her ultra feminist shite. People pay her to advocate a superiority of one gender over another.
SplashOfSummer Featured By Owner Aug 18, 2014  Hobbyist Artist
Not only that, she's pretty loaded, since the goal of her kickstarter for Tropes vs Women in Video Games was 6'000 dollars. She reached her goal in the first 24 hours, but didn't stop, and she received 2648,7% of the money she asked for. The games she bought (and probably will never finish, probably won't even finish a quarter of them) cost nowhere near as much. But, people still fell for it.
Con artist cunt.
EclipticSpectre Featured By Owner Aug 18, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Jesus Christ...I suppose it does well to put into question, just who really is responsible for giving rise to her noxious presence in the media and gaming industry alike. Is it her for outright lying to people about her motives and conning them into fuelling her means to fulfil her selfish agenda? Or is it the people who were foolish enough to fall for it without having done prior research into Anita's content, needs, goal(s), and Anita herself? Are the people at fault for blindly giving to her, and continuing to do so long after she achieved what she had aimed for?
SplashOfSummer Featured By Owner Aug 18, 2014  Hobbyist Artist
Honestly, the blame is on both of them, but overall, Anita is responsible for it. It's all well blaming the people who blindly followed her and gave their money to the kickstarter (which was a waste, anyway), however, she's the one who just let the money roll in, even after the goal had been reached. Now she's got 150 000 dollars in her pocket and a bunch of games that AREN'T GOING TO BE PLAYED. Jesus.…
ErraticBASARAfan Featured By Owner Jun 14, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
This'll be quite funny as a comeback: "if all men are pigs, then since they come from women, all women really are, is pigs wearing lipstick."
Robotic-Mind Featured By Owner Apr 21, 2014
And is she a rabid feminist AKA a feminazi?
Add a Comment: